In the world of APIs, two technologies have been dominating the conversation: GraphQL and REST.

Both have their strengths and weaknesses, but understanding when and why to use one over the other can make a huge difference in your development workflow.

This post dives into why GraphQL exists, when to use it, and how it compares to REST—all explained in simple terms with real-world examples.

  • What Makes GraphQL Special?
  • Key Features of GraphQL
  • When Should You Use GraphQL?
    • Performance Optimization for Mobile & Web Applications
    • Real-Time Dashboards
    • API Aggregation & Versioning
    • Optimizing Performance & Reducing Latency
    • Developer Experience
  • GraphQL vs. REST: Key Differences
    • 📌 A Simple Example: Fetching User Profile Data
      • 🔴 The REST Way (Multiple Requests)
      • 🟢 The GraphQL Way (One Request)
    • Understanding GraphQL Schema
      • Example GraphQL Schema:
    • GraphQL Operations: Queries, Mutations, and Subscriptions
      • 1️⃣ Queries
      • 2️⃣ Mutations
      • 3️⃣ Subscriptions
  • When to Stick with REST?
  • Conclusion
    • Further Reading

What Makes GraphQL Special?

GraphQL, created by Facebook in 2012 and open-sourced in 2015, was built to solve common inefficiencies of REST APIs.

It’s not just another API standard; it’s a query language that allows clients to request exactly what they need, nothing more, nothing less.

This eliminates the problems of over-fetching (getting too much data) and under-fetching (not getting enough data), which are common in REST APIs.

Here’s what makes GraphQL a developer’s dream:

  • Precise Data Fetching: Clients specify exactly what data they need, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching.
  • Single Endpoint: Unlike REST, which often requires multiple requests to different endpoints, GraphQL aggregates data from multiple sources in one request.
  • Strongly Typed Schema: APIs are self-documenting with a well-defined schema that ensures stability and predictability.

This results in faster applications, easier maintenance, and a better developer experience overall.

Key Features of GraphQL

  1. Efficient Data Fetching: Clients specify exactly what data they need, reducing unnecessary data transfer.
  2. Single Endpoint: Unlike REST, which uses multiple endpoints, GraphQL uses a single endpoint for all queries.
  3. Strongly Typed Schema: GraphQL APIs are defined by a schema, which ensures type safety and self-documentation.
  4. Real-Time Data: Supports subscriptions for real-time updates.
  5. Aggregation of Data: Easily combines data from multiple sources into a single response.

When Should You Use GraphQL?

GraphQL isn’t a silver bullet, but it shines in certain scenarios.

Here are some real-world use cases where GraphQL can significantly improve API performance and flexibility:

Performance Optimization for Mobile & Web Applications

  • No Over-fetching or Under-fetching: With REST, you often get more data than you need (over-fetching) or have to make multiple requests to get all the data you need (under-fetching).
  • GraphQL solves this by allowing you to request only the fields you need in a single query.
  • Faster Load Times: By reducing the amount of data transferred over the network, GraphQL improves performance, especially for mobile apps and low-bandwidth environments.

Real-Time Dashboards

  • GraphQL supports subscriptions, which allow clients to receive real-time updates when data changes.
  • This is ideal for applications like chat apps, live dashboards, or notifications.

API Aggregation & Versioning

  • Managing multiple APIs? Instead of juggling different REST endpoints, you can expose one GraphQL API that pulls data from various services.
  • Plus, you can evolve schemas without breaking existing clients, unlike REST’s strict versioning.

Optimizing Performance & Reducing Latency

  • GraphQL eliminates over-fetching (getting unnecessary data) and under-fetching (needing multiple requests to complete a task).
  • This results in faster responses and lower bandwidth usage, making it great for performance-critical applications.

Developer Experience

  • Self-Documenting: GraphQL’s schema acts as documentation, making it easier for developers to understand and use the API.
  • Powerful Tools: Tools like Apollo Client and GraphiQL provide excellent developer experiences, including auto-completion, error highlighting, and query testing.

GraphQL vs. REST: Key Differences

While REST is widely used and well-understood, GraphQL offers a more modern and flexible approach to API design. Let’s break down some critical differences:

Feature REST GraphQL
Data Fetching Multiple endpoints, often leading to over-fetching or under-fetching. Single endpoint, clients request only the data they need.
Performance Can require multiple round trips to the server. Single request for all data, reducing network overhead.
Caching Built-in HTTP caching mechanisms. No built-in caching, but third-party libraries can help. (Apollo, Relay)
Schema No schema; documentation is often separate. Strongly typed schema, self-documenting.
Learning Curve Easy to understand for developers familiar with HTTP. Steeper learning curve due to its unique query language and concepts.
File Uploads Supported natively. Not supported natively; requires workarounds.
Real-Time Updates Requires additional setup (e.g., WebSockets). Built-in support for real-time updates via subscriptions.
API Evolution Requires versioning (e.g., /v1, /v2) Schema can evolve without breaking clients
Self-Documentation Needs separate documentation (Swagger, Postman) Schema acts as live documentation

A Simple Example: Fetching User Profile Data

The REST Way (Multiple Requests)

Imagine a mobile app that needs to display a user’s profile, including their basic info, recent posts, and follower count.

  1. Request GET /user/123 → Returns basic user details (name, email, bio).
  2. Request GET /user/123/posts → Fetches recent posts.
  3. Request GET /user/123/followers/count → Gets follower count.

This means three separate requests. More requests = higher latency and wasted bandwidth when unnecessary data is included.

The GraphQL Way (One Request)

With GraphQL, the client can fetch exactly what it needs in a single query:

query {
  user(id: "123") {
    name
    email
    bio
    posts(limit: 3) {
      title
      content
    }
    followersCount
  }
}

This one request fetches all necessary data without extra fields or redundant API calls, reducing latency and improving performance.

Understanding GraphQL Schema

A GraphQL schema defines what data clients can request. It serves as a contract between the client and server, ensuring structured and efficient data retrieval.

Schemas are typically written using Schema Definition Language (SDL), which makes them easy to read and understand. The schema consists of object types, each containing fields that specify what data is available.

Example GraphQL Schema:

type Query {
  user(id: ID!): User
}

type User {
  name: String
  email: String
  bio: String
  posts(limit: Int): [Post]
  followersCount: Int
}

type Post {
  title: String
  content: String
}

Here:

  • Query defines the available queries.
  • User type contains fields like name, email, posts, and followersCount.
  • Post type includes title and content.

GraphQL Operations: Queries, Mutations, and Subscriptions

1️⃣ Queries

GraphQL queries are equivalent to REST GET requests—they fetch data without modifying it.

2️⃣ Mutations

Mutations allow clients to create, update, or delete data, similar to REST’s POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE methods.

Example mutation to update a user’s bio:

mutation {
  updateUser(id: "123", bio: "Exploring GraphQL!") {
    name
    bio
  }
}

3️⃣ Subscriptions

GraphQL subscriptions enable real-time updates using WebSockets. Unlike queries, which require manual polling, subscriptions push updates when data changes.

Example subscription to listen for new posts:

subscription {
  newPost {
    title
    content
  }
}

This keeps the client updated without making repeated requests.

When to Stick with REST?

GraphQL is powerful, REST is still a solid choice in certain scenarios:

  1. Simple APIs: If your API has straightforward data requirements, REST’s simplicity might be more appropriate.
  2. Caching Needs: REST’s built-in HTTP caching is more robust than GraphQL’s third-party solutions.
  3. File Uploads: REST natively supports file uploads, while GraphQL requires additional setup.
  4. Legacy Systems: If you’re working with an existing REST API, migrating to GraphQL might not be worth the effort unless there’s a compelling reason. Many large companies like Facebook, GitHub, and Netflix use GraphQL to power their APIs for efficiency and flexibility.

Conclusion

GraphQL offers a modern alternative to REST by allowing clients to fetch precisely what they need from a single endpoint. This results in faster applications, easier maintenance, and a better developer experience. However, GraphQL comes with a learning curve and requires backend changes, so it’s essential to evaluate whether it’s the right choice for your API needs.

Have you worked with GraphQL? Do you prefer REST for certain projects? Share your thoughts in the comments!

🚀 Follow for more API deep dives!

Further Reading

Speaking of REST and GrgaphQL, are you on REST and wanted to document your APIs? I’ve been working on a super-convenient tool called LiveAPI.

LiveAPI helps you get all your backend APIs documented in a few minutes

With LiveAPI, you can quickly generate interactive API documentation that allows users to execute APIs directly from the browser.

If you’re tired of manually creating docs for your APIs, this tool might just make your life easier.

Author Of article : Athreya aka Maneshwar Read full article